●
さっそく組みつけてみましたが…、予想外にあっさりとドライバのインストール等が終わって起動できる状況になったのには拍子抜け。Celeronが元の300MHz(FSB 66MHz)になっちゃってますけどご愛敬。
まずはHD Benchの結果から
★ ★ ★ HDBENCH Ver 3.22 (C)EP82改/かず ★ ★ ★
M/B Name
Processor Celeron 300.62MHz[GenuineIntel family 6 model 6 step 0]
Cache L1_Data:[16K] L1_Instruction:[16K] L2:[128K]
VideoCard Matrox Mystique G200 AGP - English
Resolution 1280x1024 (32Bit color)
OS Windows 98 4.10 (Build: 1998)
ALL Integer Float MemoryR MemoryW MemoryRW DirectDraw
8917 12003 12613 6692 6752 8069 3
Rectangle Text Ellipse BitBlt Read Write Copy Drive
5331 4530 1893 18 15080 15214 5062 E:\20MB
★ ★ ★ HDBENCH Ver 3.22 (C)EP82改/かず ★ ★ ★
M/B Name
Processor AMD Athlon 699.91MHz[AuthenticAMD family 6 model 4 step 2]
Cache L1_Data:[64K] L1_Instruction:[64K] L2:[256K]
Name String AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
VideoCard NVIDIA NV11
Resolution 1280x1024 (32Bit color)
ALL Integer Float MemoryR MemoryW MemoryRW DirectDraw
14002 28113 33980 12458 14888 19146 42
Rectangle Text Ellipse BitBlt Read Write Copy Drive
29320 17372 4557 158 15046 12799 5822 E:\20MB
次はFinal Reality、こっちはCeleron450の時のもの。
Database Entry Celeron 450(Based 300A)+mistiquie G200+Monster3D2
Benchmark results:
Radial blur, 5N, 40.59, rips, 5.614, Rmark
Chaos zoomer, 5N, 65.33, rips, 3.175, Rmark
25 Pixel, 5N, 234.34, kpps, 7.489, Rmark
Robots, 5N, 53.53, rips, 13.867, Rmark
Fillrate, 5N, 36.41, MPps, 7.881, Rmark
City scene, 5N, 66.07, rips, 16.395, Rmark
Video card bus transfer, 5N, 163.61, MBps, 5.209, Rmark
Direct3D bus transfer, 5N, 93.84, MBps, 8.020, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall 3D, 4.084, Rmark
Overall 2D, 4.394, Rmark
Overall bus rate, 6.052, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL SCORE, 4.472, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Database Entry Athron700+GeForce2MX
Benchmark results:
Radial blur, 5N, 51.74, rips, 7.156, Rmark
Chaos zoomer, 5N, 80.04, rips, 3.889, Rmark
25 Pixel, 5N, 520.21, kpps, 16.626, Rmark
Robots, 5N, 81.91, rips, 21.221, Rmark
Fillrate, 5N, 46.36, MPps, 10.035, Rmark
City scene, 5N, 105.83, rips, 26.261, Rmark
Video card bus transfer, 5N, 16.42, MBps, 0.523, Rmark
Direct3D bus transfer, 5N, 150.24, MBps, 12.841, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visual appearance, 100.00, percent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall 3D, 5.177, Rmark
Overall 2D, 5.523, Rmark
Overall bus rate, 4.218, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL SCORE, 5.137, Rmark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
はい、演算とメモリ部分の性能についてはほぼクロック通り、DirectDrawは飛躍的に上がり、ディスクについてはほぼそのまま、3D性能についてもMontster3D2よりは上というという結果になったみたいですね。Video card bus transferがガクッと落ちているのは謎ですけど。
とりあえず、メインのWindowsマシンとして使っていますが、トラブルらしいトラブルはなし。このまま使って様子を見たいと思います。